The Packs and their STATS

Go down

The Packs and their STATS

Post by AdrockStone on Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:11 am

I've painstakingly totaled all the forward points from Round 1 to see which pack performed best.
Tries and DGs are included, but not goals. Parenthesised numbers are for PPs, totals are for total points worth where defensive points are added:

Zoomorphs: +4-0, +2-1, +1-2(1), -4-2, -2-1, -1-1, T-0, DG-0 Total:16
Tractors: +4-2, +2-0, +1-1(1), -4-4, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:25
Merkins: +4-1, +2-0, +1-3, -4-2, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:18
Hams: +4-1, +2-0, +1-0, -4-2, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:12
Jaffas: +4-1, +2-0, +1-0, -4-2, -2-1, -1-1, T-2, DG-0 Total:23
Dragons: +4-0, +2-1, +1-2, -4-1, -2-2, -1-3, T-1, DG-0 Total:19
Hipsters: +4-1, +2-(1), +1-1, -4-1, -2-1, -1-0, T-1, DG-0 Total:17
Blancas: +4-3(1), +2-1, +1-0, -4-2, -2-1, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:28
Karruptas +4-4, +2-(1), +1-(1), -4-1, -2-1, -1-1, T-1, DG-0 Total:30
Alleynian: +4-(1), +2-1, +1-0, -4-0, -2-1, -1-3, T-0, DG-1 Total:12
avatar
AdrockStone

Posts : 34
Join date : 2014-02-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by Sippid on Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:35 am

this is the only time the Karruptas will feature at the top of any table this year.

Sippid

Posts : 312
Join date : 2014-02-14

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by jaffa on Fri Mar 14, 2014 7:19 am

Looks like binary code to me...
avatar
jaffa

Posts : 103
Join date : 2014-02-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by Actionman on Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:54 am

It does look like a statistical analysis james used to do in the early years... But hats off for the investment mu.

Maybe your pack is scarier than first thought...
avatar
Actionman

Posts : 305
Join date : 2014-02-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by jaffa on Fri Mar 14, 2014 2:10 pm

Good point bing - while it hurts my tiny little mind, that's some mighty fine research mu
avatar
jaffa

Posts : 103
Join date : 2014-02-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by EastDulwich on Fri Mar 14, 2014 2:48 pm

you still lost Mu...
avatar
EastDulwich

Posts : 93
Join date : 2014-02-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by AdrockStone on Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:22 pm

EastDulwich wrote:you still lost Mu...

Yes James, but the stats show that you, sir, shall be the eventual loser...
avatar
AdrockStone

Posts : 34
Join date : 2014-02-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by Actionman on Fri Mar 14, 2014 8:40 pm

Actually that is impressive Mu - winning the forward battle by 18 and still losing.
avatar
Actionman

Posts : 305
Join date : 2014-02-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by timmah on Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:15 am

Haha that's some geeky shit.
stupid stats.

timmah
Admin

Posts : 84
Join date : 2014-02-14

View user profile http://shbb.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by AdrockStone on Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:25 am

Actionman wrote:Actually that is impressive Mu - winning the forward battle by 18 and still losing.

Fucking Ivan Cleary and William Zillman were the difference!
avatar
AdrockStone

Posts : 34
Join date : 2014-02-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Packs and their STATS

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum