The Packs and their STATS

I've painstakingly totaled all the forward points from Round 1 to see which pack performed best.
Tries and DGs are included, but not goals. Parenthesised numbers are for PPs, totals are for total points worth where defensive points are added:

Zoomorphs: +4-0, +2-1, +1-2(1), -4-2, -2-1, -1-1, T-0, DG-0 Total:16
Tractors: +4-2, +2-0, +1-1(1), -4-4, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:25
Merkins: +4-1, +2-0, +1-3, -4-2, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:18
Hams: +4-1, +2-0, +1-0, -4-2, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:12
Jaffas: +4-1, +2-0, +1-0, -4-2, -2-1, -1-1, T-2, DG-0 Total:23
Dragons: +4-0, +2-1, +1-2, -4-1, -2-2, -1-3, T-1, DG-0 Total:19
Hipsters: +4-1, +2-(1), +1-1, -4-1, -2-1, -1-0, T-1, DG-0 Total:17
Blancas: +4-3(1), +2-1, +1-0, -4-2, -2-1, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:28
Karruptas +4-4, +2-(1), +1-(1), -4-1, -2-1, -1-1, T-1, DG-0 Total:30
Alleynian: +4-(1), +2-1, +1-0, -4-0, -2-1, -1-3, T-0, DG-1 Total:12

this is the only time the Karruptas will feature at the top of any table this year.

Looks like binary code to me...

It does look like a statistical analysis james used to do in the early years... But hats off for the investment mu.

Maybe your pack is scarier than first thought...

Good point bing - while it hurts my tiny little mind, that's some mighty fine research mu

you still lost Mu...

EastDulwich wrote:you still lost Mu...

Yes James, but the stats show that you, sir, shall be the eventual loser...

Actually that is impressive Mu - winning the forward battle by 18 and still losing.

Haha that's some geeky shit.
stupid stats.

Actionman wrote:Actually that is impressive Mu - winning the forward battle by 18 and still losing.

Fucking Ivan Cleary and William Zillman were the difference!