The Packs and their STATS
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
The Packs and their STATS
I've painstakingly totaled all the forward points from Round 1 to see which pack performed best.
Tries and DGs are included, but not goals. Parenthesised numbers are for PPs, totals are for total points worth where defensive points are added:
Zoomorphs: +4-0, +2-1, +1-2(1), -4-2, -2-1, -1-1, T-0, DG-0 Total:16
Tractors: +4-2, +2-0, +1-1(1), -4-4, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:25
Merkins: +4-1, +2-0, +1-3, -4-2, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:18
Hams: +4-1, +2-0, +1-0, -4-2, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:12
Jaffas: +4-1, +2-0, +1-0, -4-2, -2-1, -1-1, T-2, DG-0 Total:23
Dragons: +4-0, +2-1, +1-2, -4-1, -2-2, -1-3, T-1, DG-0 Total:19
Hipsters: +4-1, +2-(1), +1-1, -4-1, -2-1, -1-0, T-1, DG-0 Total:17
Blancas: +4-3(1), +2-1, +1-0, -4-2, -2-1, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:28
Karruptas +4-4, +2-(1), +1-(1), -4-1, -2-1, -1-1, T-1, DG-0 Total:30
Alleynian: +4-(1), +2-1, +1-0, -4-0, -2-1, -1-3, T-0, DG-1 Total:12
Tries and DGs are included, but not goals. Parenthesised numbers are for PPs, totals are for total points worth where defensive points are added:
Zoomorphs: +4-0, +2-1, +1-2(1), -4-2, -2-1, -1-1, T-0, DG-0 Total:16
Tractors: +4-2, +2-0, +1-1(1), -4-4, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:25
Merkins: +4-1, +2-0, +1-3, -4-2, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:18
Hams: +4-1, +2-0, +1-0, -4-2, -2-0, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:12
Jaffas: +4-1, +2-0, +1-0, -4-2, -2-1, -1-1, T-2, DG-0 Total:23
Dragons: +4-0, +2-1, +1-2, -4-1, -2-2, -1-3, T-1, DG-0 Total:19
Hipsters: +4-1, +2-(1), +1-1, -4-1, -2-1, -1-0, T-1, DG-0 Total:17
Blancas: +4-3(1), +2-1, +1-0, -4-2, -2-1, -1-0, T-0, DG-0 Total:28
Karruptas +4-4, +2-(1), +1-(1), -4-1, -2-1, -1-1, T-1, DG-0 Total:30
Alleynian: +4-(1), +2-1, +1-0, -4-0, -2-1, -1-3, T-0, DG-1 Total:12
AdrockStone- Posts : 34
Join date : 2014-02-20
Re: The Packs and their STATS
this is the only time the Karruptas will feature at the top of any table this year.
Sippid- Posts : 312
Join date : 2014-02-14
Re: The Packs and their STATS
It does look like a statistical analysis james used to do in the early years... But hats off for the investment mu.
Maybe your pack is scarier than first thought...
Maybe your pack is scarier than first thought...
Actionman- Posts : 305
Join date : 2014-02-15
Re: The Packs and their STATS
Good point bing - while it hurts my tiny little mind, that's some mighty fine research mu
jaffa- Posts : 103
Join date : 2014-02-17
Re: The Packs and their STATS
EastDulwich wrote:you still lost Mu...
Yes James, but the stats show that you, sir, shall be the eventual loser...
AdrockStone- Posts : 34
Join date : 2014-02-20
Re: The Packs and their STATS
Actually that is impressive Mu - winning the forward battle by 18 and still losing.
Actionman- Posts : 305
Join date : 2014-02-15
Re: The Packs and their STATS
Haha that's some geeky shit.
stupid stats.
stupid stats.
timmah- Admin
- Posts : 84
Join date : 2014-02-14
Re: The Packs and their STATS
Actionman wrote:Actually that is impressive Mu - winning the forward battle by 18 and still losing.
Fucking Ivan Cleary and William Zillman were the difference!
AdrockStone- Posts : 34
Join date : 2014-02-20
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|